Music Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars Very easy to replace
Reviewed in the United States on April 20, 2016
Verified Purchase
Very easy to replace. It took me exactly 10 minutes to do the job. Works fine. Hope this comparatively inexpensive repair will prolong the oven life for another 8 years.

This was the Amazon review I found giving five stars for the CD: Argento: The Mask of Night / Te Deum
 
Last edited:

Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Joe Henderson was for more than 30 years a columnist and editor at Runner's World magazine, and he has published more than 30 books. He's a veteran of more than 700 races, from sprints to ultras. He teaches running classes at the University of Oregon in Eugene and coaches a local marathon team. His older columns appear on his website, joehenderson.com, and more recent ones on Facebook as Joe Henderson's Writings.

Yes, this is ostensibly a review of the audio CD of Joe Henderson's Multiple, but filed under Books...

P. S. This was not posted to make JR angry or upset.

 
Review of: Johann Sebastian Bach, Glenn Gould :: Bach: The Two and Three Part Inventions

It's a review or concern related to the remastering, rather than an actual review of the musical performance.

Reissued for the 17th time with greatly improved sound!
PH-50-NC | Southeast USA | 07/26/2007
r_l.png
r_r.png
r_l.png
r_r.png
r_l.png
r_r.png
r_l.png
r_r.png
g_l.png
g_r.png

(4 out of 5 stars)

"Great recording. I'm not going to review Gould's playing here.

Amazon's editorial copy states "Perhaps best of all, the remastered sound is much better than that on previous issues of the disc". The "Glenn Gould Edition" from 1992 touted "High Definition Remastering", with Sony's patented "Super Bit Mapping" system. The implication was that all those craptacular late-1980s CD rushed to the market simply to fill the retail racks were a thing of the past, and Sony was doing it right--doing it, well...Super!!

Sigh...since that supposedly definitive "Glenn Gould Edition(TM)" of 1992, there's been the "70th Anniversary Edition" and a new "Sony Masterworks Edition". Always with the promise of better sound than the last time you ponied up for the same recording. I wish instead of touting basically meaningless jargon like "High Definition Remastering", CDs would come with disclaimers like "Engineer Joe Smith bumped up the upper-mid range frequencies to make the recording sound warmer, and added a touch of reverb as well", or "Engineer Mary Johnson stripped away all previous post-production effects and mastered this CD with completely neutral equalization, as her preference is for a dry, clean sound". That's what remastering comes down to--personal preferences by audio engineers as to how to equalize a give tape. It's not an objective science, something that is always improving as more digital bits become available in the equipment (mastering equipment hasn't improved at the breakneck pace that, say, laptop computers have over the last two decades).

This reissue may well sound better than the 1992 Glenn Gould edition. Or it might just sound different. I sure wish Sony (and all the major labels) would play it straight and simply tell people what the differences are, if they expect people to buy the same CD in three or four different editions.

Edit: In the case of the 1955 Goldberg variations, I prefer the sound of the earlier Glenn Gould Edition release to the recent 3-CD package that includes both of Gould's versions [though the 1981 'Goldberg Variations' did need to be remastered using the analog backup tape, and at least there Sony gave a clear description of the problem and rational for a reissue]. For the 1955 version, the earlier edition just sounds clearer and less tampered with, while the recent release sounds more distant and the notes less defined."
 
Two (um...) disparate reviews of the same recording.

Robertson Thomas | Hapcheon, Gyeongnam, South Korea | 03/20/2005
r_l.png
r_r.png
g_l.png
g_r.png
g_l.png
g_r.png
g_l.png
g_r.png
g_l.png
g_r.png

(1 out of 5 stars)

"Throughout the recording, all we hear is the melody in one hand and arpeggios in the other hand. A competent composer would provide more variety.

The recording sounds like an improvisation, and I suspect that that is what it is."


MAURICE J. BRUMM | Minneapolis, Minnesota USA | 07/22/2000
r_l.png
r_r.png
r_l.png
r_r.png
r_l.png
r_r.png
r_l.png
r_r.png
r_l.png
r_r.png

(5 out of 5 stars)

"A great tribute to the heavens in all their glory, the ethereal beauty of the great beyond is reflected in these most richly harmonic and lyrical solo piano works in classical abstract. Depth of passion and whimsical lightness balanced in solid form to respect tradition for what it is. Richard Nanes is at home with two of history's dearest pianistic, predecessors, Chopin and Beethoven in this stylistic motif."

Richard Nanes :: Nocturnes of the Celestial Seas - Piano Solos

 
What it is: Music

Big Weather is a step out of Jeff Greinke's paradigm. There are still plenty of deep atmospheres that border on extreme darkness. Greinke adds some overt rhythms to the mix and gets a different sound. He also uses a completely unexpected instrument to help build the soundscape -- a trombone. Hard as it may be to believe, Greinke's mix includes a synthesizer, sequenced rhythms, guitars, and a trombone. He processes and manipulates the guitar and the trombone to the point where they are almost unrecognizable. Deep listeners, tipped off with the clue, will recognize the wail of the trombone and the twang of the guitars. Greinke's sound design expertise pulls the soundscapes together into a delightful and quirky package. This disc will appeal to fans of Tom Heasley, David Sylvian, Holger Czukay, and Robert Fripp. It is a quirky and essential disc.


What it is not: Sounds of Weather or Nature

1.0 out of 5 stars Save your $
Reviewed in the United States on April 30, 2019
Verified Purchase

This cd is complete garbage. No weather or nature sounds period.
 
Back
Top