Random Music Thoughts

I don't think Eric Johnson is disregarded as a guitarist's guitarist.

I was reading through reviews of the G3 Live In Concert album, with EJ, Steve Vai, and Joe Satriani, and I came upon this commentary:
I just got this CD Concert, and it is in every way AWESOME! I am a lead guitarist also and particular about who I listen to. My opinion of the best of the G3 is Eric Johnson whom I have seen in concert 3 times, once when he was 17 years old, and at that time he was the absolutely best guitarist I had ever seen, (and I also met him and we talked about Stratocasters and how he modified his to get those amazing tones, he was a real nice person) that opinion still stands. Eric Johnson still plays chords in his songs, which I feel a great guitarist does, plus the most technical and tasteful leads. I don't think I heard Joe Satriani or Steve Vai play any chords at all except for the 3 last cover tunes, now don't get me wrong, I think all 3 were great! I have Joe Satriani albums also and love them, but Eric Johnson is a vituoso for good reason. I plan to purchase the DVD also. Incidentally I have worked with some really hot lead guitarists who never play a chord either, guess what? I don't think they have any idea what the chords to the tune are. Why I appreciate virtuoso Eric Johnson, complete guitarist. I have heard and seen him play Clapton, Hendrix, almost any style flawlessly. I have his "Total Electric Guitar" VHS,....WOW,...I could never learn to play so well (I spent many hours trying). Some people are born to be spectacular-Eric Johnson.
 

Trigger Alert / Disclaimer: This article may contain mentions of other music stars or celebrities who have similar or dissimilar theories or concerns regarding Semitism, Zionism, or related ethnic or racial issues.
 

Trigger Alert / Disclaimer: This article may contain mentions of other music stars or celebrities who have similar or dissimilar theories or concerns regarding Semitism, Zionism, or related ethnic or racial issues.

Sorry to get political, but Roger Waters supporting human rights for the Palestinians does not equate to being anti-Semitic.
 
Have you ever had a record playing during a sudden earthquake?

No. Somehow, I have avoided that.

Also, a quake has never shaken my CDP off its isolation roller balls.

***********************************************

 
No. Somehow, I have avoided that.

Also, a quake has never shaken my CDP off its isolation roller balls.

***********************************************

Death threats against John Denver? Now I've read everything.
 

Trigger Alert / Disclaimer: This article may contain mentions of other music stars or celebrities who have similar or dissimilar theories or concerns regarding Semitism, Zionism, or related ethnic or racial issues.
I’m agnostic on the question of whether Van Morrison is or is not anti-Semitic. However, I don’t think this particular song lyric by itself justifies Rabbi Salkin’s conclusion that he is. Van took a lot of richly deserved media criticism for his outlier response to the pandemic. I see the song as a push back against the media based on what he sees as its lockstep conformity. It certainly sounds petulant and it may even be Trumpian, but I would need more evidence to call it anti-Jewish.
 
I’m agnostic on the question of whether Van Morrison is or is not anti-Semitic. However, I don’t think this particular song lyric by itself justifies Rabbi Salkin’s conclusion that he is. Van took a lot of richly deserved media criticism for his outlier response to the pandemic. I see the song as a push back against the media based on what he sees as its lockstep conformity. It certainly sounds petulant and it may even be Trumpian, but I would need more evidence to call it anti-Jewish.

I tend to agree with you, Sam. Van has had any number of songs with lyrics that might tend to disturb. Some entrenched ideas, persons, or things could use a bit of disturbance in their force.

Nowhere does Van expressly mention Jews or any ethnic group in the verses that Martini Judaism Rabbi Salkin announces that he does. If Salkin wants to ditch Van's music into the Mystic, so be it. But, this is hardly a clarion (or shofar) call for anyone else to do it.

It strikes me as a reaction piece loosely akin to a Dennis Prager opinion piece, which itself is loosely akin to a logical argument.
 
I tend to agree with you, Sam. Van has had any number of songs with lyrics that might tend to disturb. Some entrenched ideas, persons, or things could use a bit of disturbance in their force.

Nowhere does Van expressly mention Jews or any ethnic group in the verses that Martini Judaism Rabbi Salkin announces that he does. If Salkin wants to ditch Van's music into the Mystic, so be it. But, this is hardly a clarion (or shofar) call for anyone else to do it.

It strikes me as a reaction piece loosely akin to a Dennis Prager opinion piece, which itself is loosely akin to a logical argument.
Dennis Prager! Now there's an interesting analogy. Back at the dawn of his career, Prager's semi-rabbinical style helped me work through some of the mysteries of Christianity that my Presbyterian upbringing left unsolved. Unfortunately, he jumped the shark many years ago. Perhaps it was when he filed a lawsuit to prevent the removal of the cross from the Los Angeles County Seal, seen here before and after its decrucifixion:
1620696251559.png
 
FWIW: Your Rock and Roll Hall of Fame Inductees are In:

Jay-Z
The Go-Go's
Tina Turner
The Foo Fighters
Carole King
Todd Rundgren

Additional:
Kraftwerk (Early Influencer)
LL Cool J (Musical Excellence Award)

I think I've said this before, but it's an odd era we've moved into where those one would normally think Hall of Famers are already in. What's left, as music has changed are worthy non-rock performers (Jay-Z, LL Cool J) or rock/pop performers that are nice but hardly tremendous (the Go-Go's) or artists that have been honored by the HOF before (Tina Turner, Carole King) but whose solo careers I'm not sure stand on their own as monumental (tough for many to name a King album outside of Tapestry, and Tina was great in the 80s but again hardly Floyd or the Stones as far as her discography). Then there's the Foo Fighters (in their first year of eligibility) who I can't get excited about - I can't help thinking they're in because a lot of people like Dave Grohl and he plays at all the HOF ceremonies.
Todd Rundgren is, I suppose, deserving but all to often bores the hell out of me

So as a celebration of movement, hell, let 'em in - but let others in - The Smiths, Jethro Tull, Joe Jackson, Iron Maiden. Lets celebrate them all, because we're getting past the point where we're gonna put in someone on par with The Beatles, Nirvana, or Elvis (or even, sadly, I suppose KISS and Cheap Trick)

And get off my lawn :mad:
 
Back
Top